About Me

Name:gregmc
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Fear Part Duex

 

The funny thing is I was trying to figure out a way to write this without sounding insensitive. I wanted to be politically correct so as not to offend.

Wow… the thought police almost got me there.

Last night I was talking to my little sis. We were reminiscing about our childhood. My father has recently decreed that the 26 year old man she is dating is bad news and he does not want her to see him anymore, my lil sis is 19. After some big brother probing I learned that this guy has 2 domestic violence strikes against him along with a drug conviction. He also used the tired old “if you leave me” line. This to me screams controlling abusive behavior. I addressed this with her and she said, “It’s not his fault, he was raised that way.”

Long big bro pause… deep calming breath

There is a way to talk to someone without completely turning them off of what you are trying to get across and I thank God that I did a good job of it this time.

Using familiar examples I managed to firmly plant the seed of “taking responsibility for ones own actions” in her mind. Nobody can make anybody do anything under any circumstances. I explained to her how someone like him will try to use fear to control her because he has a controlling personality and controlling personalities are typically abusers because when they can’t control someone or something they get angry and abusive. I think she understood, I know can’t control her, I can just pray for the right words to help guide her.

Way back in grade school there was a bully. I even remember his name, it was Alfred.

Alfred had this habit of picking on other people in the schoolyard. I had three encounters with Alfred.

Alfred was a heavy kid, he liked to jump on my back and put me in a choke hold, he thought this was funny. I, among other kids had asked him to stop, he didn’t. The last time he jumped on my back I jumped up in the air and came down on top of him. As he laid gasping for breath I once again demanded that he stop. He never jumped on my back but the abuse didn’t stop.

Once during our schoolyard break I received a pass and was running the ball. We were playing touch football and Alfred brutally close-lined me. After I picked myself up off the ground I caught him with a right hook and stopped, his eyes got as big as saucers and he started flinging insults and threats. Mrs. Jenkins came running over and broke it up. He never clothes-lined me again but the abuse didn’t stop. We were both punished with detention and essays but I could see in Alfred’s eye that he wanted back at me and I was a little scared. I felt the fear of his threats of more abuse.

Months later in gym class there was the third encounter. Alfred had started a new bullying tactic. He was fond of walking up next to an unsuspecting victim and driving his knee into their thigh. He did this to me once and I demanded he stop. He did it to me again in gym class and something inside me said enough is enough. I shoved him off of the bleachers (only about 4 foot drop) where he easily landed on both feet. I jumped down and kicked him in the groin which caused him to lurch over. I then proceeded to introduce his face to my knee which flung him back to a semi standing position. After that it was a flurry of blows which eventually left him a moaning bloody heap on the gym floor. I kicked his arse up one side then down the other and the force was disproportional to the knee in my thigh which instigated the entire encounter and I am proud of it. Yes liberals, I am proud I kicked his little punk arse.

From that point forth, when I was allowed to go back to school I no longer feared him, he feared me and I have carried that knowledge throughout my life.

Because of my fathers employment we often moved and as always I was often challenged by bullies. I always won. I fought with disproportionate force in every confrontation and bullies feared me. They left me and they left me and my friends alone. Yes, I was a fighter but only when threatened, never once in my life have I ever thrown the first blow.

I didn’t know it when I first started writing this but I guess what I am trying to say is, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” Whether it is a conservative politician’s fear to call the Democrats out on their weak-kneed national defense policies (or the entire lack thereof) or to boldly and clearly expose the main stream media’s biased coverage of the liberal agenda. Call them out; make them fear the truth because it is the only thing that will set this nation free.

Do not fear the ACLU, do not fear the MSM, do not fear the Communist Democrats, and don’t give in to the psychological bullying. Stand up and be proud and declare that this is a Christian Nation founded upon the guidance of our God with morals, ethics and values. We need to make them fear us because times are a changin’.

The changes are more than over-due.

We will run you out by any means necessary.

~gregmc

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Underhanded Liberal Games

 

It is an overwhelming fact that liberals not conservatives are more likely to support organizations like NAMBLA and the variety of other “alternative” lifestyle organizations.

It is irrefutable fact that the media is biased in favor of liberal agendas.

It is irrefutable fact that main stream media journalists are as an overwhelming majority liberal.

It is irrefutable fact that liberals push the tolerance for “alternative” lifestyles.

The Democratic Party is the party of liberals.

How dare they try to take the moral high ground?

It is a fact that in 2005 the media knew about the questionable emails exchanged between young pages and Foley as did the House Republicans. If both the media and the House Republican knew about the emails then you would have to be mighty naive to think the Democrats didn’t know about it too.

All of a sudden some emails from 2003 surface which were sexual in nature.

What Foley did was not even illegal, it was most certainly immoral and wrong and I personally think it should be illegal and Mr. Foley should spend some time in jail however, I digress.

Doesn’t it seem pretty convenient that the MSM and the Democrats have waited until mid-term elections to bring this to light?

If the MSM and the Democrats are so concerned by this case why did they wait until now to expose it?

I believe that if indeed the MSM and the Democrats waited until mid-term elections to expose this disgusting misconduct then they are all just as guilty of the misconduct.

If the MSM and the Democrats believe the page was in such duress as to warrant this kind of scandalous coverage then it was the responsibility of them to expose it as soon as possible, not when it was convenient to further their political cause.

This entire situation causes such disgust in me that I have avoided talking about it at all. I am so disgusted and disappointed in this sicko Foley (just five minutes that’s all I would need) but I am just as angry and astonished that the Dem’s and the MSM are allowed to get away with their underhanded non-partisan handling of this whole thing.

FOLEY DEMOCRATS MSM YOU DISGUST ME

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fear

Fear is one of mankind’s most base instincts and thus far the enemy within has used it against us. The have instilled in us such a fear to be a God loving family man that many have given in and become weak willed semblances of men who are hesitant to teach their children Christian morals and values and lead their families down the path of the Word of God.

Many of us have wanted to know what has happened to America. To learn the answer you must truly seek it. Many columnists have outlined it in as simple a format as possible and one in particular has propelled my understanding exponentially.

Why is it nobler for secular people to have a political agenda? Why can’t Christians have the same political agenda? To understand this you must research and read and understand why the Frankfurt School was founded in 1923. You must acknowledge the fruits of their research.

Linda Kimball has done an outstanding job of putting many of the puzzle pieces together and the picture which is slowly coming to be is an ugly one indeed. I have consolidated four of her most pertinent articles which were scattered on a few other blogs.

If you truly seek the answers to what has happened to America read her writings in my consolidated presentation of her articles: Communism is Alive and Active in America and then continue your research to corroborate her findings as to reveal what she writes as truth, not the panicky conspiracy theories you often see on the left.

These are the answers to most everything pertaining to the degradation of America.

Only by understanding who is attacking America and how and who is funding and supporting these organizations can we fight them.

Spread the word. I am.

~gregmc

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I am Proud

I am Proud to be a Christian.

I am Proud that I have been given the grace to embrace the faith that Jesus Christ suffered and died to pay the price for the fact that I am not inherently a good person.

I am Proud that I have friends and family who are black and brown and yellow. I am Proud that they are my friends not because the ACLU says that I have to tolerate them but because we share the common link of our Lord Jesus Christ and the morals and values He taught.

I am Proud that through my belief in our Lord Jesus I am able to attempt to walk in His footsteps although I falter on a daily basis, I still try.

I am Proud that I served my nation faithfully for ten years in the US Navy.

I am Proud that I have not succumbed to the “long walk through culture” and that only by embracing my Christian beliefs have I avoided the trappings of political correctness.

I am proud that I know that because man was made in God’s image that we are all equal, not because the ACLU says so.

I am proud that I am made in God’s image because it does not leave me with the empty feeling of the atheist who believes we are just intelligent animals.

I am Proud that the combination of my faith and common sense gives me the ability to distinguish good and evil and to have the ability and will to fight evil.

I am Proud that the communist left view me as dangerous because I will fight them to re-establish the Judeo-Christian based morals and values that this country was founded on.

~gregmc

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Communism is Alive and Active in America

This is absolutely mandatory reading for any of you who may have slipped a bit in our condemnation of the left as I recently have.

I want to thank Linda Kimball for the clear and concise consolidation of the following information. I have taken it a step further for those of you who are like me and just want it all in one article you can print for later reading. Please print and read this one. Linda yanked me back to reality…

The New Left, Cultural Marxism, and Psychopolitics Disguised as Multiculturalism

There are two misconceptions held by many Americans. The first is that communism ceased to be a threat when the Soviet Union imploded. The second is that the New Left of the Sixties collapsed and disappeared as well. “The Sixties are dead,” wrote columnist George Will (Slamming the Doors, Newsweek, Mar. 25, 1991)

Because the New Left lacked cohesion it fell apart as a political movement. However, its revolutionaries reorganized themselves into a multitude of single issue groups. Thus we now have for example, radical feminists, black extremists, anti-war ‘peace’ activists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, and ‘gay’ rights groups. All of these groups pursue their piece of the radical agenda through a complex network of subversive organizations such as the Gay Straight Lesbian Educators Network (GSLEN), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), People for the American Way, United for Peace and Justice, Planned Parenthood, Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), and Code Pink for Peace.

Both communism and the New Left are alive and thriving here in America. Code words by which they can be recognized are: tolerance, social justice, economic justice, peace, reproductive rights, sex education and safe sex, safe schools, inclusion, diversity, and sensitivity. All together, this is Cultural Marxism disguised as multiculturalism.

Birth of Multiculturalism

In anticipation of the revolutionary storm that would baptize the world in an inferno of red terror, leading to its rebirth as the promised land of social justice and proletarian equality—Frederich Engels wrote, “All the…large and small nationalities are destined to perish…in the revolutionary world storm… (A general war will) wipe out all…nations, down to their very names. The next world war will result in the disappearance from the face of the earth not only reactionary classes…but…reactionary peoples.” (The Magyar Struggle, Neue Rheinische Zeitung, Jan. 13, 1849)

By the end of WWI, socialists realized that something was amiss, for the world’s proletariat had not heeded Marx’s call to rise up in opposition to evil capitalism and to embrace communism instead. They wondered what had gone wrong.

Separately, two Marxist theorists—Antonio Gramsci of Italy and Georg Lukacs of Hungary—concluded that the Christianized West was the obstacle standing in the way of a communist new world order. The West would have to be conquered first.

Gramsci posited that because Christianity had been dominant in the West for over 2000 years, not only was it fused with Western civilization, but it had corrupted the workers class. The West would have to be de-Christianized, said Gramsci, by means of a “long march through the culture.” Additionally, a new proletariat must be created. In his “Prison Notebooks,” he suggested that the new proletariat be comprised of many criminals, women, and racial minorities.

The new battleground, reasoned Gramsci, must become the culture, starting with the traditional family and completely engulfing churches, schools, media, entertainment, civic organizations, literature, science, and history. All of these things must be radically transformed and the social and cultural order gradually turned upside-down with the new proletariat placed in power at the top.

In 1919, Georg Lukacs became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the short-lived Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary. He immediately set plans in motion to de-Christianize Hungary. Reasoning that if Christian sexual ethics could be undermined among children, then both the hated patriarchal family and the Church would be dealt a crippling blow, Lukacs--towards this end--launched a radical sex education program in the schools. Sex lectures were organized and literature handed out which graphically instructed youth in free love (promiscuity) and sexual intercourse while simultaneously encouraging them to deride and reject Christian moral ethics, monogamy, and parental and church authority. All of this was accompanied by a reign of cultural terror perpetrated against parents, priests, and dissenters.

Hungary’s youth, having been fed a steady diet of values-neutral (atheism) and radical sex education while simultaneously encouraged to rebel against all authority, easily turned into delinquents ranging from bullies and petty thieves to sex predators, murderers, and sociopaths.

Lukacs plans were the precursor to what Cultural Marxism in the guise of SIECUS, GSLEN, and the ACLU--acting as enforcer--later brought into American schools.

In 1923, the Frankfurt School—a Marxist think-tank—was founded in Weimar Germany. Among its founders were Georg Lukacs, Herbert Marcuse, and Theodor Adorno. The school was a multidisciplinary effort which included sociologists, sexologists, and psychologists.

The primary goal of the Frankfurt School was to translate Marxism from economic terms into cultural terms. Toward this end, Marcuse—who favored polymorphous perversion—expanded the ranks of Gramsci’s new proletariat by including homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals. Into this was spliced Lukacs radical sex education and cultural terrorism tactics. Gramsci’s ‘long march’ was added to the mix, and then all of this was wedded to Freudian psychoanalysis and psychological conditioning techniques. The end product was Cultural Marxism, known in the West as multiculturalism.

In 1950, the Frankfurt School augmented Cultural Marxism with Theodor Adorno’s idea of the ‘authoritarian personality.’ This concept is premised on the notion that Christianity, capitalism, and the traditional family create a character prone to racism and fascism. Thus, anyone who upholds America’s traditional moral values and institutions is both racist and fascist. Children raised by traditional values parents, we are told to believe, will almost certainly become racists and fascists. By extension, if fascism and racism are endemic to America’s traditional culture, then everyone raised in the traditions of God, family, patriotism, gun ownership, or free markets is in need of psychological help.

The pernicious influence of Adorno’s ‘authoritarian personality’ idea can be clearly seen in the following quote: “In Aug., 2003, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) announced the results of their $1.2 million tax-payer funded study. It stated, essentially, that traditionalists are mentally disturbed. Scholars from the Universities of Maryland, California at Berkeley, and Stanford had determined that social conservatives…suffer from ‘mental rigidity,’ ‘dogmatism,’ and ‘uncertainty avoidance,’ together with associated indicators for mental illness.” (www.edwatch.org ‘Social and Emotional Learning” Jan. 26, 2005) From this Orwellian quote we can see just how successful has been Gramsci’s ‘long march through the culture.’

The corresponding and diabolically crafted corrective idea is political correctness. The strong suggestion here is that in order for one not to be thought of as racist or fascist, then one must not only be nonjudgmental but must also embrace the ‘new’ moral absolutes: diversity, choice, sensitivity, sexual orientation, and tolerance. Political correctness is a Machiavellian psychological ‘command and control’ device. Its purpose is the imposition of uniformity in thought, speech, and behavior.

Critical theory is yet another psychological ‘command and control’ device. As stated by Daniel J. Flynn, “Critical Theory, as its name implies, criticizes. What deconstruction does to literature, Critical Theory does to societies.” (Intellectual Morons, p 15-16) Critical Theory is an ongoing and brutal assault via vicious criticism relentlessly leveled against Christians, Christmas, the Boy Scouts, Ten Commandments, our military, and all other aspects of traditional American culture and society.

Both political correctness and Critical Theory are in essence, psychological bullying. They are the psycho political battering rams by which Frankfurt School disciples such as the ACLU are forcing Americans to submit to and to obey the will and the way of the Left. These devious devices are but psychological versions of Georg Lukacs and Laventi Beria’s ‘cultural terrorism’ tactics. In the words of Beria, “Obedience is the result of force…Force is the antithesis of humanizing actions. It is so synonymous in the human mind with savageness, lawlessness, brutality, and barbarism, that it is only necessary to display an inhuman attitude toward people to be granted by those people the possessions of force.” (The Russian Manual on Psychopolitics: Obedience, by Laventi Beria, head of Soviet Secret Police and Stalin’s right-hand man)

Double-thinking ‘fence-sitters’, otherwise known as moderates, centrists, and RINOs are an obvious result of these psychological ‘obedience’ techniques. These people—afraid of incurring the wrath of name-calling obedience trainers--- have opted to straddle the fence lest they be found guilty of possessing an opinion, one way or another. At the merest hint of displeasure from the obedience-trainers, up goes the yellow flag of surrender upon which it is boldly written: “I believe in nothing and am tolerant of everything!”

The linchpin of Cultural Marxism is cultural determinism, the parent of identity politics and group solidarity. In its turn, cultural determinism was birthed by the Darwinian idea that man is but a soulless animal and therefore his identity is determined by for example, his skin color or his sexual and/or erotic preferences. This proposition rejects the concepts of the human spirit, individuality, free will, and morally informed conscience (paired with personal accountability and responsibility) because it emphatically denies the existence of the God of the Bible. Consequently, and by extension, it also rejects the first principles of our liberty enumerated in the Declaration of Independence. These are our “unalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Cultural Marxism must reject these because these principles of liberty “are endowed by our Creator,” who made man in His image.

Cultural determinism, states David Horowitz, is “identity politics—the politics of radical feminism, q***r revolution, and Afro-centrism—which is the basis of academic multiculturalism…a form of intellectual fascism and, insofar as it has any politics, of political fascism as well.” (Mussolini and Neo-Fascist Tribalism: Up from Multiculturalism, by David Horowitz, Jan. 1998)

It is said that courage is the first of the virtues because without it fear will paralyze man, thus keeping him from acting upon his moral convictions and speaking truth. Thus bringing about a general state of paralyzing fear, apathy, and submission—the chains of tyranny—is the purpose behind psychopolitical cultural terrorism, for the communist Left’s revolutionary agenda must, at all costs, be clothed in darkness.

The antidote is courage and the light of truth. If we are to win this cultural war and reclaim and rebuild America so our children and their children’s children can live in a ‘Shining City on the Hill’ where liberty, families, opportunity, free markets, and decency flourish, we must muster the courage to fearlessly expose the communist Left’s revolutionary agenda to the Light of Truth. Truth and the courage to speak it will set us free.

Copyright Linda Kimball 2006

http://patriotsandliberty.com/
http://lindakimball.com/

About the writer: Linda is a writer and author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview. Her articles are published both nationally and internationally.

Additional References

Slouching Toward Gomorrah, by Robert H. Bork

Intellectual Morons, by Daniel J. Flynn

Related Articles

Trotsky’s ‘Permanent Revolution’ in America

Exposing America’s Enemies, Part 2: Communist Progressive Democrats

Exposing America’s Enemies: the ‘Social Justice Seeking’ Communist Left

Trotsky’s ‘Permanent Revolution’ in America

Never before in the history of the world, has mankind witnessed the magnitude of human suffering, the utter social and familial devastation, and genocide of planetary proportions as has been seen by mankind through the actualization of Marxist theories.

It was during Marxism’s first incarnation as Marxist-Trotskyism that the patriarchal family and Russia’s Orthodox Christian church, in addition to all of Russia’s other Christian churches, were brutally shattered and destroyed. Because the family and religion are the bedrock of civilization, both had to be completely destroyed for Trotsky’s vision of a new social order populated by a New Man.

As a horrified world finally began turning away from Marxism, unrepentant Western world revolutionaries determined to keep Trotsky’s vision of world conquest alive. Conquest would be achieved through Trotsky’s theory of ‘Permanent Revolution.’
In America, unrepentant revolutionaries coalesced into a new movement during the 1960s. They called themselves the New Left.

Beginning with Lenin’s atheist premise: “God is dead, therefore humans are only stupid, soulless animals, much like dogs that can be trained and manipulated under the right conditions and with the right inducements,” the New Left began infiltrating and taking control of America’s culture-shaping “idea producing’ institutions. Their goal was to psychologically manipulate Americans into committing spiritual, cultural, political, and ultimately demographic suicide. This would be achieved through Psychopolitics, the science of sinister psychological manipulation.

The multifaceted attack began in America as it had begun in Russia under Lenin and Trotsky—with attacks upon the patriarchal family and Christianity.

Before long, the notion that marriage, domesticity and family are types of slavery began to be heard. Temptations such as ‘free-love,’ porn, and drugs were held out to husbands and fathers while the ears of wives and mothers were filled with the poisonous notion that they were sex-slaves to their husbands. “Liberation and personal fulfillment,” it was suggested, “were to be found outside the home in the workplace.” Easy divorce, abortions on demand, and plenty of daycare centers, it was insinuated, were necessary to achievement of self-fulfillment. Government-controlled schools helpfully offered various social programs, including feeding programs.

The idea that ‘unisex is cool’ was smoothly slotted into position. This was eventually followed by the idea that sodomy and erotic fantasies were the same thing as having black skin or being Irish or Italian. People who do these things, it was inferred, are a ‘species’ or ‘class’ of people who ought to have the same rights as everyone else. This new species or class is called ‘gays,’ it was intimated. The word ‘pride’ became attached to everything about the new class. Through judicial chicanery, sodomy laws were declared unconstitutional and struck down, thus awarding the new ‘species’ of ‘gay’ people with the right to engage in sodomy. “Gays ought to have the right to marry and have children (even though they cannot procreate),’ we were told.

Then very quietly, so no one would notice, the word ‘gay’ acquired an expanded meaning…sexual continuum. Almost immediately, the newly expanded definition was redefined to ‘polymorphous,” also known as androgynous, thus bringing us full circle to unisex. The gospel of unisex (also known as q_eer theory) began being taught in America’s universities. It crept into lower schools disguised as “safe school” programs. Soon little boys in some schools were being coaxed into wearing dresses.

“All of the very best people—the progressively enlightened, tolerant, and broadminded type of people—support the ‘gay civil rights’ movement while only backwards, superstition-believing Christians and red-state rednecks don’t,” we were instructed to believe. “These latter are hateful bigots who ought to be forced into ‘shutting-up’ by having hate-crime laws imposed upon them,” Trotskyites slyly suggested.

Along with the growth of these new ideas, a ‘peace and justice’ movement sprang to life. “Imperialist wars for oil” we were advised to believe, “are the world’s greatest evils.” Therefore, returning American vets deserved to be spat upon and accused of being baby killers and sadomasochists. Movies were churned out depicting our soldiers as drug-crazed murderers. America’s main stream media happily furthered these destructive messages.

“America is not a Christian nation and our Founders, being mostly atheists and deists, feared and loathed religion, and Christianity in particular,” brazenly lied Trotskyite history revisionists. Aggressive campaigns to eradicate loathsome Christianity were launched. One for the purpose of psychologically manipulating American dupes into accepting communist agitprop. The other for the removal of Christian symbols in tandem with outrageous attempts at terrorizing Christians into disappearing into the woodwork.

“A ‘multicultural’ America is a very good thing for our democracy,” trumpeted obnoxiously deceitful New Leftists. Thus the poison of nation-destroying communist multiculturalism was injected into America’s culture and politics. Along with it came other poisonous baggage: political correctness, speech codes, sensitivity training, and open borders agendas.

Weaving in and through this toxic brew has been the steady drumbeat of “America is bad…America is evil…America is corrupt…America deserves to be punished.” Linked with the poisonous drumbeat has been a malevolent whisper campaign to sow seeds of discord: envy, victimization, suspicion, fear, and distrust.

It has taken about forty years for the traitorous New Left to bring America to its current level of disunity, decay, debauchery, and chaos. In Bolshevik Russia, by contrast, all of these things occurred with terrifying speed and with deadly consequences.

Under Lenin and Trotsky, marriage was simply abolished and the patriarchal family crushed. Divorce was made easy, abortions were free, and “free-love” of every type abounded. When asked, “Is Bolshevism deliberately destroying the family?” Trotsky emphatically responded, ‘yes’. (Family Relations Under the Soviets, Leon Trotsky, 1934; www.marxists.org)

Why destroy the traditional family? Karl Kautsky explained, “communism…tries to convert its community into a new family…the presence of the traditional family tie is…a disturbing influence.” The utopian society, in other words, is to be one big commune where the “brotherhood of unisex industrial robots” have anonymous sex with anonymous partners. Children, if not aborted, will be raised in State incubators. (www.marxists.org)

Towards this end, it was seen as necessary to try and destroy sexual polarity (the two sexes) and condition mankind to accept the idea of androgyny (unisex).
The Bolsheviks literally tore down “the walls that divided homosexuality…from the rest of society.” (People of the Moonlight” www.workers.org) New Soviet legislation was “tolerant, diverse and inclusive.” It stressed that “all forms of sexual gratification should be treated the same way—as natural.” (The War to End all Wars” www.workers.org) For further information, see my previous article “The Bolsheviks ‘Gay Pride’ Disaster and its Lessons for America”.

Trotsky’s Bolsheviks brutally crushed the Christian church and killed millions of Christians. Before the Revolution, 83.4 percent of the population identified as Christians. Since the revolution, some sixty million people were killed and sixty-six million sent to prisons and labor camps. At least half of these were Christians.

As revealed by the Library of Congress: “The Soviet Union was the first state to have as an ideological objective the elimination of religion…the communist regime confiscated church property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in the schools. The main target was the Russian Orthodox Church…Nearly all of its clergy, and many of its believers were shot or sent to labor camps.” (Revelations from the Russian Archives, Library of Congress). With two exceptions—the killing of believers and the confiscation of church property—the anti-Christ New Left is already doing everything else on the list.

Under Lenin and Trotsky, the State took control of millions of children. About half were orphaned due to the revolution and the famine. The other half however, were orphaned as a direct consequence of Lenin and Trotsky’s cruelly inhumane dekulakization and collectivization schemes in combination with their determined efforts at destroying the family. These children were crowded into deplorable state-run Detdomas (schools) and their minds filled with atheism and values-free teaching. The idealized “New Man” which communist planners thought to create, turned out to be anti-social monsters. Russian citizens, wearied and angered by Detdoma criminals, reacted with shouts of “Beasts!” “Damned hooligans!” “Damned bandits!” “”They should be destroyed!” Even the Chairman of the Baku Children’s Commission characterized them as “robbers, hooligans, and murderers, impossible to mold into human beings.” Another official said they “will never become human beings; every one will…end up in Solovoki (labor camp). (And Now My Soul is Hardened: Abandoned Children in Soviet Russia, 1918-1930, Alan M. Ball; ark.cdlib.org)

Stalin, though one of history’s greatest mass-murderers, did at least try to revive the family and put an end to Russia’s epidemic of crime and debauchery. Toward these ends he all but put an end to divorce and abortion. Sodomy, prostitution, and homosexuality were criminalized and decrees promulgated aimed at “bringing to justice, and punishing with the full force of law, any adolescent older than twelve who is convicted of burglary, acts of violence, grievous bodily harm, mutilation, or murder.” Courts were secretly advised that the “full force of law” includes the death penalty. (The Black Book of Communism, p. 177)

On March 8, 1983 President Reagan delivered his famous “evil empire” speech at the Annual Convention of the National Association of Evangelicals. He said, “The Soviet system…has purposely starved, murdered, and brutalized its own people. Millions were killed; it’s all right there in the history books. It put…citizens it disagreed with into psychiatric hospitals…drugging them into oblivion. Is this system that allowed this not evil?” (www.ronaldreagan.com)

“This system” (communism) is indeed evil, and today it is working its evil right here in America. Already suggestions have been made by Leftists that conservatives and Christians are ‘mentally ill.’ Likewise, and just as happened in Russia, America’s atheist controlled Detdoma (schools) are churning out monsters. How is it that so many Americans cannot see this evil even when it twists and perverts their own children into sociopaths, sex predators, and murderers such as the Columbine killers? It is as if millions of American’s are sleep-walking to their doom. Wake up, Americans! Trotsky’s Permanent Revolution is already half-way completed.


Copyright Linda Kimball 2006
http://lindakimball.com/

About the writer: Linda is a writer and author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview. Her articles are published both nationally and internationally.

Additional Resource:
“The Collected Works of Charles Colson”

Exposing America’s Enemies: the ‘Social Justice Seeking’ Communist Left

On one hand, Americans were outraged and appalled by the 1 May immigrant demonstrations that clogged streets and virtually closed down some cities. Law abiding citizens saw lawbreakers who not only seemed to feel justified in their criminal behavior, but also believed they ought to be rewarded for it.

On the other hand, Americans are more infuriated and disgusted with their duly elected government officials in both legislative and administrative branches for not enforcing the law and protecting the rights of citizens. President Bush and the weak-kneed GOP have deservedly come under fire. However, if our sovereign nation is to survive, I is of paramount importance that the harsh light of truth be focused upon the subversive element responsible for creating an atmosphere conducive to lawlessness and tyrannical militants brazenly declaring their intentions to ‘conquer’ the Southwest and to throw Americans out of their homes and off of their land.

The subversive element—a motley collection of Marxists, Stalinists, Trotskyists, Maoists, anarchists and malcontents—organized themselves in the 60’s and became known as the New Left. For over forty years the New Left has been waging a Gramscian ‘quiet’ revolution for the overthrow of the America of our Founders. Today these subversives call themselves liberals, progressives and Democrats. Even though there yet remains good, decent Democrats such as Zell Miller, the majority as David Horowitz attested to, are social justice seeking communists. “The Democratic Party is very close to being the (Communist-controlled Progressive) party of Henry Wallace…The vast bulk of the American left is a Communist left and they’ve introduced some fascist ideas like “identity politics,” which is straight out of Mussolini.” (How Marxism Dominates the Left, Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com, June 1, 2005)

America’s Communist Left operates in a vast interconnected matrix of revolutionary groups disguised as respectable civil rights and legal organizations. These front groups have consistently worked towards the transformation of America through subversion of America’s Rule of Law, Constitution, judiciary, and all institutions necessary to the longevity and health of our nation and civilization. These groups attack all national security measures, subvert immigration laws and procedures, lobby on behalf of terrorist and enemy combatants and engage in propagandistic apologetics for the most brutal dictatorships in the world even as they constantly vilify and demean America and Americans. As they do these things to destroy America and shame Americans, they hypocritically portray themselves as defenders of democracy and humanity.

The purpose of this article is to expose, at least in part, some of the principal communist groups responsible for undermining and weakening America and who likewise serve as a power source, not only for the militant Marxist organizers of the recent demonstrations, but for Islamic jihadists as well.

The Quiet Revolution
In 1984, “The Power to Lead” was published. In it, author James McGregor Burns admitted: “The Framers of the US Constitution have simply been too shrewd for us. They have outwitted us. They designed separate institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail bridges, tinkering. If we are to ‘turn the Founders upside down’…we must directly confront the constitutional structure they erected.” (A Chronological History: The New World Order by D.L. Cuddy PhD)

Turning the ‘Founders upside down’ and directly confronting the ‘constitutional structure’ are what the American Civil Liberties Union, National Lawyers Guild, and The Center for Constitutional Rights are committed to doing. Together, these three communist front groups comprise the “legal left,” and they slash and rip at the fabric of the constitutional framework.

The ACLU was established in 1920 by Roger Baldwin, a Stalinist who candidly admitted: “I am for socialism, disarmament, and ultimately, for abolishing the state itself.” On the Communist Party USA website, the ACLU can be found at this link: www.cpusa.org/link/category/22/

When not working with and defending terrorists like Sami al-Arian, the ACLU terrorizes towns into removing Ten Commandments monuments and crosses and persecutes and intimidates Boy Scouts and law abiding Christians. The ACLU’s Immigrant Task Force and Immigrant Rights Project are a dual driving force in the Open Borders Lobby. Among current projects: dissolving America’s borders, erasing all evidence of Christianity and God and requiring the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) to provide free legal counsel to illegals while simultaneously demanding that illegals be provided with full welfare benefits.

The ACLU and its partner groups receive funding from a large assortment of subversive leftist funders. Among them: Arca Foundation, Ford Foundation, George Soros Open Society Institute, Rockefeller Foundation, Woods Fund of Chicago (Source: www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)

The National Lawyers Guild was founded in 1936 by the Communist Party USA. The NLG is an active affiliate of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, which served as a Soviet front group during the Cold War. The NLG defines its mission as an effort to: “unite lawyers, law students, legal workers, and jailhouse lawyers of America (to) function as an effective political and social force…to the end that human rights shall be regarded as more sacred than property interests.” In other words, their mission is to ‘deKulakize’ America in the name of social justice.

In 1999, NLG member Chip Berlet described a Guild ‘communist debate’ session: “The cacophony at some meetings (arises from) debates featuring…Leninist, Trotskyite, Stalinists…Maoist…Marxist, anarchists, libertarians and progressive independents…with multiple identities as lawyers, legal workers, labor organizers, tribal sovereignty activists, civil liberties and civil rights advocates, environmentalists, feminists, gay men and lesbians, and people of color.” Chip Berlet is an activist with Morris Dees Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), another communist front group and Open Borders member.

Not coincidentally, it was the SPLC that ‘redistributed’—in the name of social justice—an Arizona ranchers’ property to some illegal aliens. This incident was detailed in an article entitled: “Two Illegal Immigrants Win Arizona Ranch in Court,” New York Times, 8/19/05. Dees was quoted as saying, “…it’s poetic justice that these undocumented workers own this land”

Like the ACLU, the NLG is a key member of the Open Borders Lobby. It’s National
Immigration Project consists of a network of lawyers, law students and legal workers committed to “full democratic rights for all non-citizens”---in the name of social justice.
The NLG receives funding from, among others, the George Soros Open Society Institute and the Ford Foundation. (Source: www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)

The last of the trio is the Center for Constitutional Rights. It was founded in 1966 by pro-Castro attorneys Morton Stavis, Ben Smith, Arthur Kinoy, and William Kuntsler.
The CCR prides itself on using “litigation proactively to advance the law in a positive direction to guarantee the rights of those with the fewest protections.” This is communist code for: “We subvert America’s laws.” Among those deemed by the CCR to be in need of protection are terrorist organizations, enemy combatants, and illegal immigrants.
The CCR receives funding from the Ford Foundation and George Soros Open Society Institute. (Source: www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)

Two principal front groups, both of whom disguise their treachery as ‘civil rights,” are United for Peace and Justice and Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride.

The UFPJ is a rabidly anti-American, anti-war coalition co-chaired by committed communist Leslie Cagan. Cagan, who worships upon Fidel Castro’s altar, was an original founder of the Committees of Correspondence, a splinter group of the Communist Party USA. The UFPJ was created Oct. 25, 2002 in the Washington D.C. offices of People for the American Way, which played a key role in forming UFPJ. UFPJ is a sponsoring organization of the Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride.
UFPJ’s social justice agenda extends well beyond anti-war activism as it is also a pro-abortion, pro-open borders advocate that condemns nearly every aspect of American culture and our government’s foreign policy. (Source: www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)

The Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride (IWFR), another key player in the Open Borders Lobby, is supported by the ACLU and Communist Party USA. Additionally, it has the backing of Dennis Kucinich, Howard Dean and Joe Lieberman.Among other groups listed as members of the IWFRC’s national sponsoring committee are ACORN, National Council of La Raza, National Immigration Forum, and United for Peace and Justice.

At the link below are literally hundreds of sponsors of IWFR, such as: Democratic Senators, Representatives, County Board Supervisors, Governors, town council members, radical organizations, liberalized Christian and non-Christian churches, political parties (including CPUSA and Democratic Socialists of America).
http://www.iwfr.org/endorsement.asp

Many thousands of Americans have been taken in by a myth. The myth states that communism died when the Soviet Union imploded. It further says that in these ‘enlightened progressive times,’ only superstition-believing McCarthyite rednecks still believe in the communist boogieman. The myth of course, was created by New Left communists to whom seduction, deception, and psychological manipulation are the ‘rules of the game.’ Gramsci’s transformational revolution is very much alive. It’s spreading the cancer of godless communism—the ideology from Hades—throughout the length and breadth of our culture--corrupting and decaying everything it touches.

President Ronald Reagan cautioned that: “…without God, there is no virtue because there’s no prompting of the conscience. And without God, democracy will not and cannot long endure. If we ever forget that we’re one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.”

Americans---awaken and remember!

Copyright Linda Kimball 2006
LindaKimball.com

Additional Sources

Why the Left Hates America, Daniel J. Flynn
Unholy Alliance, by David Horowitz
The Open Borders Lobby and the Nation’s Security After 9/11, by William Hawkins and Erin Anderson, FrontPageMagazine.com, Jan. 21, 2004

About the writer: Linda is a writer and author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview. Her writings are published both nationally and internationally.

Exposing America’s Enemies, Part 2: Communist Progressive Democrats

From Exposing America’s Enemies: the ‘Social Justice Seeking’ Communist Left, comes this relevant quote: “For over forty years the New Left has been waging a Gramscian ‘quiet’ revolution for the overthrow of America’s Constitution, Rule of Law, sovereignty, and our way of life. Today the subversives call themselves liberals, progressives, and Democrats (and) as David Horowitz attested to (the majority are) social justice seeking communists.

“The Democratic Party is very close to being the (Communist-controlled Progressive) party of Henry Wallace…the vast bulk of the American Left is a communist left.” (How Marxism Dominates the Left, Phil Brennan, NewsMax.com, June 1, 2005)

The Backbone Campaign is a communist front group in the lefts vast interconnected matrix of revolutionary groups. On its website it declares its goal is to: “empower citizens to nominate, comment on, and rate progressive leaders to serve as a virtual Progressive Parallel Administration…we are not content running campaigns, but preparing to run the country.” (www.backbonecampaign.org/cabinet/)

Chief among Backbone Campaign sponsoring organizations is the Progressive Democrats of America, who are committed to: “dismantling the military industrial complex.” (ibid)

“The Progressive Caucus is made up of the most Far-Left members of Congress and best represents the socialist wing of the Democratic Party.” (Radical Road Maps, James H. Hansen, p. 186) Progressive Democrats are responsible for installing Howard Dean as Democratic National Chairman. In Feb. 2005, Dean was quoted by U.S. News and World Report as exclaiming: “I hate the Republicans and everything they stand for.” Deans power base, according to DiscoverTheNetwork.org, are a bunch of “campus communists.” The Progressive Caucus will be the focus of this article.

Social Justice is Communism

Judging from the adolescent name-calling and howls of protest which my previous article elicited from Progressive groups such as the Democratic Underground, it is obvious that the enraged howlers have no idea of what it really means for one to be a seeker of social justice. Either that or they really do know but are deceivers of the first magnitude.

Be that as it may, some clarification and definition of the terms—social justice and communism-- is in order before proceeding on to the issue of Progressive Democrats.

To most Americans, communism means the Kremlin, gulags, killing fields, and Mao’s brutal Red Guard. These things though were not the essence of communism. They were the visible manifestations of inhumane power and its consequences, all of which resulted when social justice seekers acquired total control to remake society and man.

The essence of communism is social justice, or justice in the social sphere. This is code for the elimination of poverty, of suffering, and of all differences between humans that erect walls between people. Fundamentally, social justice is a process of elimination that results in sameness (egalitarianism). When social justice seekers speak of the need for equality, what they’re really calling for is sameness.

However, the attributes which make people different from each other and which social justice seekers are determined to eliminate, are the product of human nature and of freely made choices. For instance, some people are ambitious and hard-working while others are indolent and lazy and may willfully choose to live out of the pockets of the former.

It’s the positive aspects of human nature that make a society dynamic. Dynamism is the animating force behind America’s greatness--her productivity, excellence, creativity, free markets, etc. In eliminating human differences, social justice seekers kill all of this, and as they did in the former Soviet Union, leave behind a smoking ruin haunted by despairing cookie-cutter claymation beings.

In speaking of the social justice process of elimination, Balint Vazsonyi remarked, “Prophets of social justice—communists, whether by that name or any other name—focus on who should have less. Because they have nothing to give, they can only take away. First, they take away opportunity. Next, they take away possessions. In the end, they have to take away life itself.” (America’s 30 Years War, Balint Vazsonyi, p. 59)

The America of our Founders simply cannot coexist with the Search for Social Justice. For instance, as designed by our Founders, the Rule of Law exists to guarantee that unequal (different) people can have individual liberty, rights and possessions—including land ownership, which social justice seekers view as the original sin. Social justice demands that those who possess more of anything have it taken away from those who earned it and redistributed to those who did nothing to earn it.

“Social Justice Seeking” Democratic Progressive Caucus

The Democratic Progressive Caucus (DPC) is an organization comprised of about sixty Members of Congress. It was founded in 1991 by Rep. Bernie Sanders, former socialist mayor of Burlington, VT and member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). The DSA describes itself as, “the principle U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International.” (www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org)

The DPC advances its communist agenda behind innocuous sounding phrases such as social and economic justice. The three core principles of The Progressive Promise are:

1. Fighting for economic justice and security for all. (Code for: We’re going to ‘eliminate poverty and suffering’ by taking away all of your possessions and redistributing them.)
2. Protecting and preserving our civil rights and civil liberties. (Code for: We’re going to ‘eliminate’ all differences and pound everyone down to the lowest common denominator).

3. Promoting global peace and security. (Code for: We—your Superiors—will finally feel secure and at peace once agendas 1-2 have been carried out to completion.)
(Source: www.bernie.house.gov/document_display_text.asp?FileToConvert=/pc/index.asp)

In “Pelosi Leader of Progressive Caucus,” it was revealed: “Until 1999, the website of the Progressive Caucus was hosted by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). Following an expose of the link between the two organizations in World Net Daily, the Progressive Caucus established its own website.” (WorldNetDaily.com, Nov 11, 2002)

On the website of the DSA it boldly declares: “We are socialists…Democracy and socialism go hand in hand…wherever…democracy has taken root, the vision of socialism has taken root as well.” (www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org) The DSA increases its influence and power by networking with the Democratic Party to advance social justice programs and policies such as affirmative action and Stalinist hate crime laws. “Like our friends and allies in the feminist, labor, civil rights, religious, and community movements, many of us have been active in the Democratic Party.” (ibid)

Following are brief descriptions of some of the social justice seeking subversives in the Democratic Progressive Caucus whose words and actions embrace the tenets of communism:

1. Barbara Lee (D-CA): “former agent of the Black Panther leader and convicted killer, Huey Newton. Lee conspired with fellow communist, Cong. Ron Dellums, who used his authority to impede US foreign policy with regard to the Communist dictatorship of Grenada.” (www.DiscoverTheNetwork.org) “anti-American Communist who supports America’s enemies and has actively collaborated with them.” (Radical Road Map, James H. Hansen, p.189)
2. Jim McDermott (D-WA): “In 2002, McDermott and fellow Progressive Caucus member Rep. David Bonoir (D-Mich) and Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) traveled to Baghdad, where they publicly embraced Saddam Hussein and created propaganda on his behalf.” (www.DiscoverTheNetWork.org)
3. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill), who has accepted an award from the DSA once told one of its writers: “The American people are not ideological; therefore, the way to go is to attack private power.” (ibid)
4. John Conyers (D-MI): “In 1981 Conyers co-hosted a delegation from the Soviet front World Peace Council, giving that group a forum in Congress. Conyers endorsed a Communist-led antiwar demonstration in Washington in 1983 and…spoke at another Washington demonstration led by ANSWER in 2003.” (Radical Road Map’s, James H. Hansen, p 189)
5. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) “has taken part in…CAIR (a radical group with ties to Mideast terrorist organizations) events…including a Ramadan iftar…hosted (on Capitol Hill) by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), Loretta Sanchez (D-CA), and Barbara Lee (D-CA).” (Kucinich Headlines Muslim Fundraiser, WorldNetDaily.com, Nov. 30, 2003)

The Constitution requires that members of Congress “shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation to support this constitution.” The Oath of Office sworn to by US Senators reads:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the U.S…that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

Very simply, if Democratic Progressive Caucus members truthfully believed in the Christian-Judeo God and likewise in our Constitution---the document conceived of by our Founders and not the Lefts living document nonsense—they wouldn’t be social justice seeking communists. Rather, they would be Conservative Constitutionalists. That they are social justice seekers tells us that when they took their oath before God, they lied. Quite simply—they lied.

In Noah Webster’s 1828 edition of the American Dictionary of the English Language we find the correct term to apply to treacherous Democratic Progressives. That word is “traitor,” and the following definition is the one most likely referred to by our Founders. “Traitor: One who violates allegiance and betrays his country; one guilty of treason…who, in breach of trust, delivers his country to its enemy…who aids an enemy in conquering his country.”

Through use of Stalinist psycho-politics, America’s Communist Left imprisoned the consciences of Americans within psychic strait-jackets of political correctness. As long as we allow ourselves to be chained by political correctness, we will not be able to identify and speak openly about our enemies---those without, and those within. In the absence of freedom of conscience and of clear and honest speaking, we can neither formulate strategies for our safety nor deal appropriately with the treacherous deceivers operating amongst us who are colluding with our enemies and plotting to destroy our nation from within. The first order of business then, is for all Americans to break out of the psychic strait jackets of political correctness, thus allowing Truth to expose the treachery and treason at work in our nation.

Truth will set us free: “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” John 8:32

Copyright Linda Kimball 2006
LindaKimball.com


About the writer: Linda is a writer and author of numerous published articles and essays on culture, politics, and worldview. Her writings have been published both nationally and internationally.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Civil War?

Humans forget, especially when it’s convenient or contradictory to our established societal norms. I have attempted to engage some of my friends and family concerning today’s current events and many of them just don’t have a clue. Sometimes they display obvious discomfort and just veer the conversation in another direction. They want to talk about T.O. which I later learned meant Terrell Owens, or some other such nonsense.

I grew up as many Americans did, playing football, wrestling, practicing martial arts and racing BMX. I enjoy my X-Box and my mountain bike and my dog and movies and my music and so on and so on but my attention has been diverted to the very survival of my way of life and I don’t think many Americans even really understand how severe the threat really is.

Something else that disturbs me deeply is the line that has been drawn between the right and the left.

I have recently begun talking to a good man here at work that we will call David. David is a “progressive” but through my conversations with him I have discovered that this “lefty” really is not that much different from me. He is a bit older than I am (I am 34) and has much insight concerning the need for “progressive” thinking but, in contrast he has a crystal clear understanding of the importance of moderation concerning someone’s beliefs and the implementation of those beliefs on society. He shares some of the same fears I do.

I have done a whole lot of soul searching over the past several weeks and I am afraid that the growing divisions between The Left and The Right are going to plunge this country into some serious infighting. Considering the threats this country faces, infighting is the last thing we need. In my brief research and basic understanding of The Fall of Rome, this infighting is precisely what lit the fire that eventually burned the Roman Empire to the ground.

Don’t get me wrong, I am still the same Greg as before and the extreme side of me invites the possibility of Civil War so we can eliminate the overabundance of tolerance and political correctness and those who advocate it but, I believe the consequences of that would make us vulnerable to outside aggression.

I am 100% guilty of left bashing and I am not quite to sure how to reconcile both sides to meet in the middle to set aside differences and come together long enough to unite us all as Americans regardless of our political views. Considering the animosity on both sides is reconciliation even possible at this juncture?

Depending on the severity, when (not if) the next terrorist plan for a chemical, biological, radiological (CBR) or even a massive conventional strike against soft targets is finally accomplished what kind of chaos will ensue? I am afraid that many radicals on both the left and right may take the opportunity to organize and open up on each other when we should instead unite to support the emergency efforts towards recovery.

I am curious if anyone else shares these concerns and if so what are you opinions or ideas?

Is there any precedence established to either support my fears or to alleviate them?

~gregmc

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Electronic Warfare Technician

 

I have had a few requests to explain exactly what an E’dub (EW) does so here it goes.

Hopefully without taking the chance of some dark glasses, trench-coat wearing NSA government SUV detaining me in a dark alley somewhere I can explain a little.

If you ever saw the movie Clear and Present Danger you will remember a sailor in the Combat Information Center or CIC yelling out “TAO (tactical actions officer) Vampire, Vampire, Vampire!” That was an EW.

As of August 2000 when I was honorably discharged from the US Navy the definition of Electronic Warfare was “Military action involving the use of electromagnetic energy to determine, exploit, reduce, or prevent hostile use of the electromagnetic spectrum, and action which retains friendly use of electromagnetic spectrum.”

Imagine a radar operator on the RFS Kiev looking at their screen and tracking contacts.

Now imagine someone on the USS Ashland “listening” to that other radar.

On equipment known as the AN/SLQ-32 or Slick 32 and other variants of ESM/ECM (electronic surveillance measure/electronic counter measure) gear the “finger print” of that ships radar is presented along with the bearing. Range is not available but the bearing can be correlated with the radar operators who do have the range.

That finger print typically consists of:

  1. Freq = Frequency
  2. PRI = Pulse Repetition Frequency
  3. PW = Pulse Width
  4. ST = Scan Type
  5. SR = Scan Rate

Using books which compile thousands of lines of this information we can determine exactly what type of radar is emitting that fingerprint. The search for a match usually starts with the frequency then you further narrow it down using the additional parameters usually ST and SR next.

You can occasionally identify a ships class based on one radar emission however when you get more than one radar emission from one platform you can identify a platform easier.

More often than not you will be looking at navigation and surface search radars however the fun ones are the Gun Control Radars, Missile Acquisition Radars and Missile Guidance Seekers.

It was our job to acquire, assess, and disseminate information pertaining to and the countering of threats to the ship. As of my discharge date this could be done by several methods.

  1. Chaff = Metal shavings in the air to distract an active radar based missile seeker.
  2. Flares = Flaming hot flares to distract a heat based missile seeker.
  3. Jamming = Basically make a missile miss its mark by overwhelming it with electromagnetic interference (rough explanation)
  4. CIWS = Close in Weapons System. 6 barrel 20MM 200 RPM anti-missile system. You may recall the F-16’s getting shot down by the battle ship on Steven Segal’s movie Under Siege.
  5. RAM = Rolling Airframe Missile. Similar to the CIWS but it uses a highly modified AIM-9 missile frame.

Basically our primary function was Anti-Ship missile defense. We did much more to include intelligence/threat analyses, theater of operation threat expectancy, deceptive lighting (fun stuff) and maintenance of our hydraulic, launcher, cooling and electrical/electronic systems to name a few.

There is a saying in the Navy, if you see the EW’s grabbing their K-Pocs and running for the rail you better grab yours and follow.

I have reviewed my article several times and there is no information in it which you can’t find on the internet or in a Jane’s manual so I think I am safe from the intelligence agencies God bless their hearts.

Just some fun (to me anyways) info, hope you enjoy!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Have Finally Discovered What Liberals do Right!

Through many hours of pouring over and analyzing massive amounts of information, most of which required a research team of monumental proportions (me) I have finally figured out what the left does right ! ! !

music

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ignorance and Selfishness Inviting Vulnerability

 

On October 5th 2006 a group of radical leftists are planning and instigating a “Day of Resistance”.

The World Can't Wait! Stop the Bush Regime!

On October 5, people everywhere will walk out of school, take off work, and come to the downtowns & townsquares and set out from there, going through the streets and calling on many more to join us - making a powerful statement: "NO! THIS REGIME DOES NOT REPRESENT US! AND WE WILL DRIVE IT OUT!"

First off, as gramps has indicated this seems a whole like a call for a coup.

Left Calling For A Coup?

The timing for this whacko liberal temper tantrum couldn’t be worse. These selfish kids are willing to risk the rest of us to take a day off of work or school to stand in the streets waiving their paranoia exposing cardboard signs.

We are in the middle of a war and more importantly in the middle of our enemy’s most prominent holiday, a holiday which has historically prompted more attacks.

Like a group of children with no forethought, they are going to try to cause more problems than this nations people need to deal with.

Not only are they diverting much needed attention to protect our nation to themselves they are also making themselves a target for attacks.

These types of gatherings also have the potential to erupt into chaos.

Alarmist alert!

Rioting?

Worse?

Oct 5th.

Just please keep your eyes open and be ready.

Better safe than sorry.
~gregmc

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Further Analysis of the NIE

 

As I re-read the Declassified Key Judgments of the National Intelligence Estimate last night I realized that I had overlooked some of the more important aspects of it in my passion to disprove the Democrats spin.

·         We assess that the operational threat from self-radicalized cells will grow in importance to US counterterrorism efforts, particularly abroad but also in the Homeland.

This particular paragraph sent shivers down my spine but it also assured me that our government might actually keep what is occurring in Europe from getting out of control here in America.

We have all heard the stories about the ultra-violent street gang MS13 or Mara Salvatrucha helping Muslims cross the southern border of the United States. We also know that prayer rugs and other signs of Muslim presence have been left in the desert of Arizona. We know the radicals are here in America and it remains not if but when we are struck. I can tell you right now that if our government won’t protect us we will rise up and protect ourselves, that’s our right. They better get on the ball.

It has been thoroughly confirmed that the Saudi subsidized Mosques here in America are preaching anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism.

THE VIRUS IS ON OUR SOIL FOLKS. Now the question is what are we going to do about?

President Bush, you and your administration darn well better get over political correctness real quick and do your job or your people are going to step up to be the men and women they are to do your job for you.

Decent people have a tendency to wait until the last moment to retaliate; sometimes they wait until it is already too late. Are we going to be those people? Are we those people already?

When the ACLU lawyers step up to the plate to defend the radicals.

Arrest those ACLU lawyers as traitors to our country.

Protect us or we will protect ourselves.

Call me an alarmist but I believe it is getting that severe.

 

Liars?

·         Recent condemnations of violence and extremist religious interpretations by a few notable Muslim clerics signal a trend that could facilitate the growth of a constructive alternative to jihadist ideology: peaceful political activism. This also could lead to the consistent and dynamic participation of broader Muslim communities in rejecting violence, reducing the ability of radicals to capitalize on passive community support. In this way, the Muslim mainstream emerges as the most powerful weapon in the war on terror.

The unfortunate thing about Imams speaking out against the violence is the question of whether we should believe them or not. If you notice, so far as we can tell Middle Eastern Muslims adhere to every command of the Quran so therefore, what is there to convince us that these moderate Imams are not just telling lies? Another something that disturbs me is that if any prominent Imams did speak out against Jihad we should hear about death threats against them, but we don’t.

Bukhari: V7B67N427

“The Prophet said, ‘If I take an oath and later find something else better than that, then I do what is better and expiate my oath.’”

Bukhari: V4B52N268

“Allah’s Apostle said, ‘War is deceit.’”

Now granted, there are many passages in the Bible, the OT in particular that are as unsavory however Christianity has gone through the necessary reforms. These reforms are actually more correct interpretations in my opinion, not guided by state greed, but that is another matter entirely.

 

Hope?

·         If democratic reform efforts in Muslim majority nations progress over the next five years, political participation probably would drive a wedge between intransigent extremists and groups willing to use the political process to achieve their local objectives. Nonetheless, attendant reforms and potentially destabilizing transitions will create new opportunities for jihadists to exploit.

By spreading Democracy not only do we make things better for the nations we spread it to we also make things safer for America. During the initial phases of the implementation of democracy things are rough for that nation. People will die and the struggle may surge back and forth but only through superior war fighting capabilities will we ever be successful. This is what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan; we have ousted dictators and are now trying to stabilize those regions to ensure the democracy we implement is effective. We must also ensure Fort Knox’s contents are still worth a dime through the continued trade of our dollar for oil (Iran); hey I’m ok with that.

 

I would like to focus on the last sentence of the above paragraph.

·         Nonetheless, attendant reforms and potentially destabilizing transitions will create new opportunities for jihadists to exploit.

Good morning Democrats, that is once again a lesson in common sense. When you invade a country with the intent of removing a dictatorship which is in and of itself successful, and insurgents use civilians as human shields, or those civilians are sheltering the insurgents either through cowardice or support, the chances are that it is going to get worse before it gets better.

But

Maybe these societies have been so backward for so long it is hopeless for them.

 

The following two excerpts seem almost contradictory to the prior.

From the paragraph “Four underlying factors are fueling the spread of the jihadist movement:

·         Entrenched grievances, such as corruption, injustice, and fear of Western domination, leading to anger, humiliation, and a sense of powerlessness; (2) the Iraq jihad;

We must find those grains which tip the scale i